Roger-Luc Chayer (Image : AI / Gay Globe)
The President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January 2025 aimed at “protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation.” A transgender rights advocacy group claims that the student health clinic at McGill University now refuses to prescribe hormone replacement therapy to American students under the age of 19, due to this executive order.
Is this information accurate, and do presidential laws and executive orders have legal force in Canada or at McGill University?
At this stage, there is no reliable and verifiable confirmation that this claim is accurate in its entirety.
First, a U.S. presidential executive order, even if signed by Donald Trump, has no legal force in Canada. U.S. executive orders apply only to U.S. federal institutions and cannot compel a Canadian university such as McGill University to change its medical practices.
Furthermore, regarding the specific allegation (an executive order from January 2025 on “chemical and surgical mutilation” and a refusal of hormone replacement therapy for American students under 19 at McGill University), there is no solid and widely recognized public source confirming both the exact existence of this order in that wording and an official policy change at McGill’s student clinic based on it.
This type of situation can sometimes arise from confusion between political debates in the United States regarding gender-affirming care, and internal healthcare access policies at university clinics, which may vary independently of foreign laws.
The U.S. presidential executive order signed in January 2025 by Donald Trump does exist and uses language aimed at restricting or discouraging gender-affirming care for minors, including through federal funding mechanisms in the United States.
There is no solid public evidence that this order requires or even directly instructs a Canadian institution such as McGill University to deny hormone treatments to American students (or anyone else). A U.S. executive order has no legal jurisdiction in Canada.
The allegation that McGill’s student health clinic changed its practice specifically because of this executive order is not confirmed by reliable official sources. If restrictions do exist, they may stem from other factors such as internal medical policies, clinical guidelines, age of consent rules, insurance coverage, or provincial healthcare regulations in Quebec, but the direct link to the U.S. executive order remains speculative.
This is why it is essential to verify and corroborate information circulating on the internet and social media. Distinguishing fact from fiction is key to understanding complex political and healthcare issues, particularly when they involve trans healthcare policy, international politics, and institutional medical practices.
ADVERTISING
TO READ ALSO