Roger-Luc Chayer
A well-known activist in Montreal’s gay community and
founding member of a pedophile club has recently undergone
trial in Montreal and tried to introduce, in defense, the concept
absolutely ridiculous that pedophilia was a sexual orientation
and that she should have the same protections as the others
orientations, such as homosexuality and bisexuality. obviously,
the judge did not fall into the trap and convicted
the accused, who should know his sentence shortly, while
the Crown announces that she will even ask that it be declared
dangerous offender to control. Here are some interesting excerpts
of the judgment:
The accused faces trial on counts of alleged offenses
child pornography, sexual contact, counseling
commit the offense of sexual touching, indecent assault,
gross indecency, as well as possession and
illegal firearm. The question now is whether the department
public has shown that the accused committed the other offenses
which are alleged against him, and beyond a reasonable doubt.
The evidence of the Crown is mainly composed of the testimony
of the two alleged victims, that of an undercover
having worked with the accused for a period of nine months,
e-mail exchanges between the accused and the undercover officer, from the
two searches carried out at the accused’s residence in the middle
and at the end of the investigation, conversations intercepted during the investigation,
and the out-of-court statement given by the accused to the
following his arrest. The defense lawyers recall that
identifying oneself as a pedophile is not, in itself, a
offense in Canadian law.
They point out that the fact that the accused defines pedophilia
as a sexual orientation – and that he militates in this sense – does not
is not a crime. And they invite the Tribunal to analyze the
objective evidence, without prejudices or preconceptions.
Following his arrest, the accused was questioned by the police.
He freely and voluntarily gave a video statement
more than 12 hours in connection with this case. Although he has
refused to answer certain specific questions concerning
allegations of sexual contact at Y’s and X’s place he confirmed
several other aspects of the evidence. Regarding pornography
Juvenile on the Internet, he confirmed to have accessed it for his « consumption
personal « . During the course of the investigation, certain communications
of the accused were intercepted by means of installed microphones
surreptitiously at his home.
During the search of January 27, 2016, a firearm
22 Long Annular Riffle was discovered in the top of the wardrobe
of the accused’s bedroom, with his ammunition. These
items were freely accessible without being locked. Circumstances
The seizure also infers that the weapon and its
ammunition was stored in a negligent manner and without
take enough precaution (sic) for the safety of others.
In his 50-page judgment, Judge Yvan Poulin will recognize
convicted the accused on 13 counts. Note that the judgment
has been appealed by the accused, who now declares that he
was using child pornography for artistic purposes and
that this does not constitute a crime. To be continued…